Enterprise AI for Cybersecurity, Threat Modeling & GRC

Fortivisor combines AI threat modeling, cyber risk quantification and compliance reasoning to identify emergent attack vectors and control coverage, then synthesize a prescriptive roadmap for security and GRC.

Native support for leading security and compliance frameworks,
with an adaptable engine capable of extending to new or custom standards on demand.

GDPR
ISO 27001
SOC 2
DORA
NIS2
NIST CSF
HIPAA
EU AI Act
FedRAMP
Beyond

Security & GRC Intelligence You Can Act On

Move beyond static checks. Harness emergent intelligence to model threats along your value streams, expose control gaps, and synthesize a security & compliance implementation plan that evolves with your enterprise.

System-native
Threat Modeling

Fractal modeling with "Arenas"
Capture segments, systems, interfaces, connectors, and assets in one coherent graph that stays aligned with your real architecture.
Living, versioned model
Track architecture changes over time so threat models evolve with your environment instead of drifting away from reality.
Ready for AI reasoning
Produce a clean, queryable graph that Fortivisor’s AI can evaluate for risk, posture, and compliance across frameworks.

AI-assisted
Reasoning Engine

Ensemble AI reasoning
Use graph analytics, threat catalogs, and LLM agents to surface risks and link them to impacted controls and legal clauses.
Value-driven triage
Rank findings by business impact and data sensitivity, then sync decisions into the governed risk register so posture stays current.
Interface‑driven emergence
Identify complex threats arising from the interplay of systems, teams, and boundaries, rather than just component flaws.

ChatGRC:
Context-Aware Advisory

Dual‑grounded advisory chat
Answer questions from a single interface backed by both your enterprise model (systems, flows, assets, risks) and curated security/compliance catalogs.
Clause‑linked responses
Return every answer with explicit references to relevant articles, controls and policies, so guidance is immediately defensible to auditors and regulators.
Persona‑aware explanations
Tailor language and depth for CISOs, GRC, privacy, and engineers, while keeping all answers grounded in the same underlying facts and clauses.

When do we need to appoint a DPO under GDPR?

A DPO is required when you are (a) a public authority, (b) monitoring individuals at scale, or (c) processing special-category data at scale.

GDPR Art. 37
Overview
Sources

Which flows cross internal → public and touch PII?

Found 2 connectors:
batch-export → s3-public  
assets: email_list· Δ 5
api-orders → web-gateway  
assets:
customer_profile  · mTLS: off · Δ 3

Why
Open risk
Recommend control
Sample conversation, Illustrative only.

Engineered Compliance Plans

Prescriptive compliance plan
Turn findings into a sequenced plan of controls and mitigations, prioritized by business criticality and effort-to-impact ratio to maximize immediate risk reduction.
Governed risk register
Maintain a live, immutable register with assigned owners, treatment decisions, and review cadences, replacing static spreadsheets.
Audit‑ready evidence packs
Export comprehensive bundles including DPIA artifacts, decision logs, and clause‑level citations to prove compliance for auditors and regulators.
Continuous alignment
When your architecture or regulations change, Fortivisor re‑runs SCÈNE on affected Arenas and refreshes the plan so security and compliance never drift apart.
Role‑aware perspectives
Present the same compliance plan in views tailored for CISOs, GRC, privacy, and engineering, all backed by the same underlying model and facts.

Generate the Blueprint of your GRC

Join the waitlist for adaptive compliance that updates as your enterprise evolves.

THE SCENE METHOD

Fortivisor’s original framework for Trust Modeling, Ensemble Reasoning, Rational Consensus, and Immutable Compliance

Seed

Frame the Arena
Model one truthful slice of your enterprise, including zones, systems, interfaces, flows and assets, into a living graph that AI can query for security, risk and compliance.
01

Cast

Deploy Lenses
Activate security, privacy, resilience, and platform lenses on the same Arena so each stakeholder can converse with the same underlying model in their own context.
02

Evaluate

Run Ensemble
Utilize the lenses to detect emergent threats, control gaps, and cross-framework collisions, and to populate the risk register with clause-linked evidence.
03

Negotiate

Debate Rationally
Let perspectives collide on shared evidence so rational, auditable decisions about risk mitigation and controls emerge for all stakeholders to reach consensus.
04

Enact

Enforce Coherence
Turn consensus into governed change across risk & GRC: assign owners, set review cadence, and update registers with an immutable, legally sound audit trail.
05

Set the SCENE for a resilient future across your enterprise

Secure your spot. Be the first to orchestrate your cybersecurity and compliance with the full SCENE lifecycle.

Who Fortivisor Helps

Contextualized for every expert.
Deliver role-specific insights that resolve operational pain and drive unified resilience.
Image
Florian Aigner
Security Architect
Pain points
  • Boundary crossings hide risk; spreadsheets miss edges.
  • Hard to prove control coverage “everywhere it matters.”
  • Evidence is scattered across tools.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Flow-centric view of risky connectors/interfaces.
  • Evidence-backed proposals you can accept or adjust.
  • Governed risk register with owners and reviews.
Quote Icon

From architecture to posture, explained and auditable

Image
Sofia Rossi
Platform / DevOps Lead
Pain points
  • “Add controls” often means latency/regressions.
  • Fire drills from unknown flow changes.
  • Security asks lack actionable context.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Ranked flows with concise “why this,” low noise.
  • Practical control proposals aligned to your surfaces.
  • Ownership loops that fit delivery cadence.
Quote Icon

Harden the edges at delivery speed

Image
Michael Lee
GRC/Compliance
Pain points
  • SoA is static and manual.
  • Control drift; ongoing coverage is hard to show.
  • Audit evidence requests drain time.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Control gaps by clause and impacted systems.
  • Live SoA tied to concrete flows and owners.
  • Exportable evidence packs with clear rationale.
Quote Icon

Continuous compliance driven by real flows

Image
Claudia Weber
Privacy / DPO
Pain points
  • Residency/data-flow questions derail audits.
  • Diagrams are stale; evidence spread across teams.
  • Risk acceptance lacks clear rationale.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Data-flow posture with residency/sector tags.
  • Findings mapped to clauses and policies.
  • Risk items with rationale, approvers, and review dates.
Quote Icon

Sensitive data paths known and provable

Image
Hugo Martin
CISO / Head of Security
Pain points
  • Dashboards don’t explain why.
  • Risk isn’t clearly owned or budgeted.
  • No single view of residual risk by critical flow.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Explainable posture with traceable evidence.
  • Risk register with owners, trends, and treatment.
  • Clarity on which flows move the needle.
Quote Icon

Explainable posture with owned risk

Image
Johannes Maier
Top Management / Business Owner
Pain points
  • Security spend vs. business impact is unclear.
  • Risk language is opaque; decisions feel slow.
  • Fear of disruption to the roadmap.
What Fortivisor brings
  • Prioritized actions tied to key business flows.
  • Simple metrics: residual risk down, accountability up.
  • Start small, prove value, scale without friction.
Quote Icon

Faster decisions, backed by evidence

Ready to explore value-centric security & GRC?

Join the Fortivisor waitlist to get early product updates, demo invites and rollout details.